Categories & segments

Philadelphia poster
Philadelphia

Casting What-Ifs

Day-Lewis; Keaton; Murray; Williams; Leguizamo; Woods

In the discussion (2)
Approx. transcript time · 01:24:19Read transcript
Philadelphia poster
Philadelphia

Half-Assed Internet Research

Real cases; weight loss; role discomfort; Vawter; military ban; Demme’s friend

In the discussion (2)
Approx. transcript time · 00:28:38Read transcript
  • The film’s 26 million budget, 206.7 million gross and ninth-place 1993 ranking contradict Kramer’s prediction of commercial failure.
  • Research: the story draws on two attorneys’ discrimination cases; Hanks lost 30 pounds; Steenburgen’s personal dislike of the role became a line; Ron Vawter’s HIV status caused insurance difficulty; the party’s military costume references the service ban; a friend’s AIDS diagnosis motivated Demme.
Philadelphia poster
Philadelphia

Apex Mountain

Jonathan Demme; direct-to-camera dialogue; Springsteen in film; evil Robards

In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 00:54:46Read transcript
  • Most Rewatchable Scene: the opening Philadelphia montage and Springsteen song, with documentary-like camera interaction. Chris calls it a possible opening-credits Apex; Bill ranks the song among Springsteen’s best, and Wesley compares the montage to local Action News.
  • The opening direct-to-camera Hanks–Washington confrontation is recalled as a scene nominee.
  • Apex: Denzel rejected; Hanks’s adjacent early 1990s plateau is discussed with Forrest Gump preferred. Demme is affirmed after comparison with Silence of the Lambs; Banderas’s earlier Spanish/art-house career is preferred.
  • Apex affirms direct-to-camera dialogue, Springsteen’s use in film and evil Robards. Gay 1990s films and Philadelphia films are rejected; cartoon homophobia faces a Talented Mr. Ripley alternative, and the fictional Stallion Showcase prompts a joke rather than a clear award.
Philadelphia poster
Philadelphia

Picking Nits

Rejected case; theater evidence; thin relationship; perfect family; secretary

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:30:57Read transcript
  • Nitpicks: why would so many lawyers reject a strong discrimination case, and how did investigators discover Andy’s specific theater visits?
  • Nitpicks: Andy and Miguel lack individual relationship detail; the film seeks tolerance rather than their self-defined humanity. Wesley compares the mechanism with Green Book while distinguishing Philadelphia’s contemporary purpose. The uniformly supportive family lacks tension.
  • Nitpick: Andy’s secretary reacts too casually to locating a crucial document.
Displaying discussions 4765 - 4776 of 8676 in total