Picking Nits
Rejected case; theater evidence; thin relationship; perfect family; secretary
In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:30:57Read transcript
- Nitpicks: why would so many lawyers reject a strong discrimination case, and how did investigators discover Andy’s specific theater visits?
- Nitpicks: Andy and Miguel lack individual relationship detail; the film seeks tolerance rather than their self-defined humanity. Wesley compares the mechanism with Green Book while distinguishing Philadelphia’s contemporary purpose. The uniformly supportive family lacks tension.
- Nitpick: Andy’s secretary reacts too casually to locating a crucial document.