Clarence Worley Should Have Died
Nick Rice
In the discussion (7)
- The award for the biggest cop-out of an ending is invoked; wondering how the film should have ended is part of why it is rewatchable.
- One proposed ending has Clyde anticipate Nick's move and blow him up in the cell or escape, or plant a second briefcase so Nick must choose between killing both of them or City Hall.
- Nick has to die: outside the two murderers he is the one most to blame, and Clyde kills everyone else around him.
- A counterpoint compares Seven, where the final murder has to happen, and calls this a bad David Fincher film; but in Seven John Doe is outside the two leads, so killing Nick would validate Clyde's killings, unless Clyde blows both of them up.
- Another alternative: at the recital Nick's tie could carry poison, since the film sets up Clyde's tie that strangled a man; the ending may have been planned and chickened out of, like going for it on fourth down all game and then kicking a field goal.
- The ending should have been settled earlier, from the cellmate killing; Clyde would have had to die or choose not to go through with it, instead of dumb Nick outsmarting the CIA operative.
- Returning to it at the end: Nick has to die in the last scene; one voice says 'I think we all agree' it is a better movie if he dies.





