‹ All people

Film credit

Harrison Ford

Also referred to as Ford

Stats

Episodes featuring their films
9
Movies in this archive
13

Rewatchables episodes featuring Harrison Ford’s films

What Lies Beneath

2000 film

Bill Simmons · Chris Ryan · Mallory Rubin

Aired January 14, 2026

Witness

1985 film

Bill Simmons · Mallory Rubin

Aired August 26, 2025

Working Girl

1988 film

Bill Simmons · Amanda Dobbins · Joanna Robinson

Aired June 10, 2025

Star Wars: A New Hope

1977 film

Bill Simmons · Chris Ryan · Sean Fennessey · Van Lathan

Aired May 6, 2025

Star Wars: A New Hope

1977 film

Bill Simmons · Chris Ryan · Sean Fennessey · Van Lathan

Aired May 6, 2025

The Fugitive

1993 film

Bill Simmons · Chris Ryan · Mallory Rubin

Aired February 6, 2024

The Fugitive

1993 film

Bill Simmons · Chris Ryan · Andy Greenwald

Aired November 2, 2017

Displaying all 9 episodes

Mentioned in discussions

What Lies Beneath

Not Like This: Beloved Star in an Unwelcome Role

Evil Harrison Ford; disguised Colin Farrell; Roman J. Israel. Interview with the Vampire still praised.

The panel proposes a new category here.

In the discussion (5)
Approx. transcript time · 01:37:56Read transcript
  • Seeing Harrison Ford play a man who kills women is called upsetting because the viewer identifies him with heroic roles.
  • The category name “Not Like This” is proposed for beloved actors in unwelcome roles. — Bill Simmons
  • Interview with the Vampire is called a really good movie despite using Cruise in an unwelcome role. — Bill Simmons
  • The Penguin is described as difficult to watch because a participant wants favored actor Colin Farrell to remain beautiful, although his performance is praised. — Bill Simmons
  • Roman J. Israel is proposed as Denzel’s analogous title and is explicitly disliked. — Mallory Rubin
In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 01:36:03Read transcript
What Lies Beneath

Apex Mountain

Cinematic Vermont, tentatively; no firm consensus.

In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 01:16:42Read transcript
  • Pfeiffer, Ford, ghost movies, cheating-husband comeuppance movies, haunted-house movies, Zemeckis, and the waterlogged corpse are considered and rejected or questioned. — Bill Simmons
  • Cinematic Vermont is proposed and receives tentative approval. — Bill Simmons
  • Grown Ups 2 is jokingly offered as a competing Vermont answer. — Bill Simmons
  • Grown Ups 2 is called good, and a participant says his children love it and the family owns it. — Bill Simmons
What Lies Beneath

Casting What-Ifs

No replacement leads; Ford in The Perfect Storm discussed instead.

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:11:24Read transcript
  • The original stars are said to have been specifically wanted, leaving no conventional casting what-if for this movie. — Bill Simmons
  • The episode reports that Ford turned down The Perfect Storm to make What Lies Beneath. — Mallory Rubin
  • That choice is welcomed because a Boston accent is considered a poor fit for Ford. — Bill Simmons
What Lies Beneath

Mallory Rubin Award: Did This Movie Need a Better Sex Scene?

Possessed-desk scene praised; more explicit material or a Madison flashback proposed.

In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 00:56:50Read transcript
  • Pulling away from the couple’s early sexual encounters is defended as adding anticipation.
  • The neighbors’ sounds, Claire’s leg over Norman’s shoulder, and their established-marriage routine are praised as useful glimpses.
  • The possessed desk scene’s lip bite and torn shirt are called nearly perfect.
  • They propose showing Claire masturbating while Norman watches.
  • A Madison flashback is proposed as a contrast that could initially be mistaken for Claire and Norman. — Chris Ryan
  • Frantic is cited as an earlier Ford film with stronger sexual energy. — Mallory Rubin
In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 00:54:18Read transcript
  • The award is given to Harrison Ford, who is reported to be 57 and exceptionally lean and muscular. — Bill Simmons
  • Norman’s age, laboratory workload, and rainy Vermont life are cited as reasons his body seems implausible. — Bill Simmons
  • Boating, sailing, drives, sexual activity, and lifelong fitness are offered as defenses. — Bill Simmons
  • Shirtless Sam Elliott in Landman is described as carved from a tree trunk and compared with Ford’s body at age 57. — Bill Simmons
What Lies Beneath

What’s Aged the Best?

Ford’s casting; camera movement; planted payoffs; symbolism; star pairing; Vermont; bathroom danger; Cooper; still-photo anecdote.

In the discussion (10)
Approx. transcript time · 00:48:14Read transcript
  • Casting Harrison Ford as a man who tries to kill his wife after The Fugitive is praised as inspired against-type casting. — Bill Simmons
  • The camera’s subtle following movement is praised for creating the sense of a ghost watching Claire. — Bill Simmons
  • The paralytic agent, key, clipping, missing cell service, and hitched boat are praised as planted details that pay off in the climax. — Bill Simmons
  • The Adamant shop name, pendant design, and Celtic-knot key are described as obvious but effective symbols. — Mallory Rubin
  • Pairing major stars in a polished film, using Vermont as a scary setting, and showing an attractive cellist are praised.
  • Dangerous bathroom scenes and a mysteriously full bathtub are praised as effective fears. — Mallory Rubin
  • Dogs sensing evil is praised, with Cooper cited as intuitive. — Mallory Rubin
  • A participant reports that high-school friend Scott Carino appears as Claire’s late husband in two photographs; friend Jeff Gallo treated the appearance as a highlight of 2000. — Mallory Rubin
  • A participant recounts returning from vacation to find a bathtub filled by a clog and a dripping fixture. — Mallory Rubin
  • A participant recalls being told that the person rendered as “Vanessa Marcel” was very attractive during the friend’s Melrose Place work; the identity rendering remains transcript-uncertain. — Bill Simmons
What Lies Beneath

What’s Aged the Worst?

Spoiler-heavy trailer; Claire staying in the house; Norman missing the possession; limited eroticism; student-attraction premise; empty-nester framing.

In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 00:08:20Read transcript
  • The trailer is condemned for revealing that Norman is suspicious and showing Claire’s possession, which drains suspense from the twist.
  • Remaining in the house after repeated frightening events is called reckless enough to make Claire responsible for her danger. — Mallory Rubin
  • Norman is criticized for taking too long to recognize that his wife is possessed. — Mallory Rubin
  • The film is considered too unerotic to function as the erotic thriller suggested by its marketing. — Mallory Rubin
  • The idea that a student’s attraction to Norman would be rare is rejected because Harrison Ford’s appeal makes that premise implausible. — Bill Simmons
  • The script’s treatment of Claire as an empty nester without an identity is called insufficiently delicate. — Chris Ryan
Jeremiah Johnson

Recasting Couch

Harrison Ford, Daniel Day-Lewis, Russell Crowe, Brad Pitt, and several current actors are considered by decade.

In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 01:06:44Read transcript
Displaying discussions 1 - 12 of 100 in total

Films in the archive