‹ All people

Filmmaker & guest

Steven Spielberg

Steven Spielberg appears as a guest on The Rewatchables episode about 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Also referred to as Spielberg

Stats

Episodes credited in this archive
1
Movies in this archive
1
Attributed podcast choices
1

Across the table

Appearing on these Rewatchables episodes

Displaying 1 episode

Mentioned in discussions

In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 00:40:12Read transcript
  • Roger Ebert is reported to have awarded four stars to both the original release and the 1980 revised cut. — Bill Simmons
  • The quoted revised review calls the new version better and asks why Spielberg did not make the original version this good. — Bill Simmons
  • Ebert and Siskel are recalled as admiring the film while saying its middle section drags. — Sean Fennessey
  • The panel argues that this pacing complaint now feels minor beside the film's lasting meaning and visual achievement. — Chris Ryan
In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:40:56Read transcript
Podcast choices
Speaker not identified
Steven Spielberg
Speaker not identified
Steven Spielberg
Speaker not identified
Steven Spielberg
In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:40:43Read transcript
Minority Report

Producer review

Does not click; overlong; cold visuals and uneven early CGI

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:41:04Read transcript
  • The invited response says the film does not click on a second viewing despite recognizing Spielberg’s intended achievement.
  • The runtime is criticized as about half an hour too long and dragging, with two-and-a-half-hour blockbusters considered less usual then. — Van Lathan
  • Cold bleached visuals and uneven early digital effects are disliked; consistently stylized older films are considered less distracting than mixed convincing and weak CGI. — Bill Simmons
Minority Report

Apex Mountain

Nokia Wave; Cruise–Spielberg collaborations; Spielbergian techno-noir; Samantha Morton; pre-cogs and pre-crime

In the discussion (7)
Approx. transcript time · 01:24:33Read transcript
  • Minority Report is called the apex of Nokia Wave: tactile near-future technology, paranoia and state surveillance, with GoldenEye, Bourne, Ronin and related thrillers offered as context. — Bill Simmons
  • Apex claims for the two individual careers are rejected, but their collaboration is affirmed over War of the Worlds; that film is still defended. — Bill Simmons
  • Spielbergian techno-noir is an affirmative Apex subject, with this film preferred to AI. — Bill Simmons
  • Evil von Sydow roles are not considered at their peak here; Strange Brew and Victory are discussed. — Bill Simmons
  • Samantha Morton is affirmed at a career peak around this film and Morvern Callar. — Van Lathan
  • McDonough is rejected as a single-film peak because of a long run of recognizable roles. — Van Lathan
  • Pre-cogs and pre-crime departments are affirmed; Washington films and Philip K. Dick adaptations are not. — Bill Simmons
Minority Report

What’s Aged the Best?

Seamless world-building; hand-operated displays; Agatha; real-time countdown; adult themes

In the discussion (7)
Approx. transcript time · 00:15:22Read transcript
  • Future technology is embedded in action without exposition; personalized ads establish the surveillance obstacle that leads naturally to the disturbing eye replacement. — Chris Ryan
  • Damaged noir characters, including the blind drug dealer, disgraced surgeon and wheelchair-using prison supervisor, preserve Philip K. Dick’s distinctive world. — Bill Simmons
  • Cruise manipulating pre-crime images with his hands holds up better than Disclosure; modern headset use and possible movement training are discussed. — Bill Simmons
  • Morton’s unsettling Agatha is praised despite being difficult company; her victimhood deliberately interrupts the action and humanizes the film. — Chris Ryan
  • The stated remaining time of 51 minutes 30 seconds reportedly matches the time left in the film. — Van Lathan
  • Ordinary domestic routines interrupted by action and Cruise saying the film’s title are praised. — Van Lathan
  • Sex, adultery, drugs and murder represent adult Spielberg, although his apparent discomfort with sex is joked about.
Minority Report

Half-Assed Internet Research

Expert-led 2054 design; production history; noir and Hitchcock influences; Fugitive parallels

In the discussion (8)
Approx. transcript time · 00:13:58Read transcript
  • Spielberg reportedly convened fifteen experts for three days and developed an eighty-page 2054 guide; his predictions of personalized advertising and privacy loss are considered prescient. — Bill Simmons
  • The first Cruise–Spielberg collaboration reportedly began development in 1997 but was delayed by Mission: Impossible 2 and AI; several production companies were involved. — Van Lathan
  • Cruise and Spielberg reportedly took fifteen percent of gross to hold the budget below one hundred million dollars. — Bill Simmons
  • The reported budget is $102 million and worldwide gross $354 million. — Chris Ryan
  • Diaz, Crowe and Anderson reportedly make uncredited subway appearances; the literary Anderton is described as older, bald and out of shape. — Van Lathan
  • The literary ending is tentatively recalled as exile to another planet; the original pre-cogs differ markedly, while Spielberg’s noir viewing and deliberate overlighting shaped the film.
  • The car-factory scene reportedly draws on an unfilmed North by Northwest sequence described to Truffaut. — Bill Simmons
  • Parallels with The Fugitive include a framed protagonist, subway recognition, trusted-colleague betrayal, appearance changes, risky escape jumps and a ceremonial public exposure.
The Blues Brothers

Probably Unanswerable Questions

Spielberg’s career; Bob’s pursuit; smell; Belushi’s future; SNL film control

In the discussion (8)
Approx. transcript time · 01:04:22Read transcript
  • If Spielberg followed 1941 with this runaway production, would he still direct Raiders? A Poltergeist follow-up is explicitly framed as a joke at Hooper’s expense. — Bill Simmons
  • Why Bob abandons his business to pursue the brothers over $200 is questioned; humiliation is offered as motivation. — Bill Simmons
  • The country bar seems far removed culturally from Chicago, though nearby Indiana could explain it. — Chris Ryan
  • The scarcity of explicit cocaine use in apparently drug-fueled period movies is questioned, with Cruising a disputed example involving uncertain substances.
  • How badly the brothers smell is questioned given unwashed clothes, sewer travel and restaurant patrons objecting even amid smoking. — Chris Ryan
  • The Colleen Camp poster raises a playful shared-universe question with Apocalypse Now and an imagined veteran attending the band.
  • Belushi’s potential future is debated between more blockbuster comedies and serious acting; an imagined America’s Guest script illustrates spontaneous early-1980s filmmaking. — Bill Simmons
  • Whether this production encouraged Lorne Michaels to gain more control of SNL adaptations is asked; later contractual participation and power are discussed with explicit uncertainty. — Bill Simmons
Displaying discussions 25 - 36 of 80 in total