Chilton’s pen, Catherine’s food, missed moth evidence, Lecter’s elaborate escape, profiling by personal acquaintance, Precious’s capture, Miggs’s death, Lecter’s wine pairing and moral code, and Gumb’s target selection
In the discussion (11)
- Chilton imposes exhaustive safety rules and then leaves a sharp pen with Lecter. — Chris Ryan
- Gumb is supposedly starving Catherine to loosen her skin, yet she has enough food and bone to lure Precious. — Mallory Rubin
- Investigators miss cocoons in multiple throats and fail to infer a skin suit from systematically removed body areas. — Mallory Rubin
- The most dangerous prisoner receives only two guards and no visible camera surveillance. — Bill Simmons
- Lecter fits perfectly into a guard’s clothes, removes his face cleanly, raises and stages the second body, and fools medical professionals while healthy.
- Lecter’s apparent profiling insight is weakened because he already knew Gumb as a patient. — Chris Ryan
- Catherine’s off-screen bucket capture of a small, skittish dog is treated as mechanically improbable. — Bill Simmons
- Miggs cannot physically swallow his own tongue without first severing it. — Bill Simmons
- Chianti is criticized as the wrong wine for liver and fava beans. — Bill Simmons
- Lecter’s disgust at Miggs’s sexual assault seems inconsistent with his own cannibalism, though the panel frames it as a strict code against rudeness. — Bill Simmons
- The panel asks whether Gumb knowingly chose a senator’s daughter for notoriety or failed to recognize her. — Chris Ryan