‹ All movies
Body Double poster

Body Double

114 minutes

Cast

Selected cast credits · Film reference

Craig Wasson Jake Scully
Gregg Henry Sam Bouchard / Alexander Revelle
Melanie Griffith Holly Body
Deborah Shelton Gloria Revelle
Guy Boyd Jim McLean
David Haskell Drama teacher
Dennis Franz Rubin
Rebecca Stanley Kimberly
Larry Flash Jenkins Assistant director
Monte Landis Sid Goldberg
Linda Shaw Linda Shaw

Body Double | The Rewatchables

Explore episodeClose episode

Half-Assed Internet Research

Body-double premise; casting and dubbing; box office; locations; audition rumors

In the discussion (12)
Approx. transcript time · 00:06:43Read transcript
  • De Palma’s combative interview style and post-Scarface three-picture deal are connected with doubling down on sex and violence; the body-double idea reportedly grew from Dressed to Kill.
  • Robert Avrech reportedly worked from De Palma’s reinterpretations of Hitchcock, and the studio rejected the original plan for unsimulated sex.
  • Shelton’s performance was reportedly redubbed by Helen Shaver, an unusual American-production choice; an interview suggests Shelton’s own voice is normal, while Shaver’s sultry tone is praised.
  • Griffith’s casting and nomination revived her career; De Palma reportedly knew her through Trivial Pursuit with Stephen Bauer and recovering actors.
  • A $10 million budget and $8.8 million gross are reported; De Palma’s continued sense of failure contrasts with later affection for the movie.
  • Kael’s disappointment is contrasted with Ebert’s praise and her earlier De Palma advocacy; her Hollywood experience and critical judgments are debated.
  • The discussion identifies several real adult performers and Bauer’s cameo, while naming Michael Kearns as the stunt-cock performer; these are podcast casting claims rather than newly verified metadata.
  • Locations are listed with explicit uncertainty about the Beverly Center and whether the video store is Tower; the Chemosphere is preferred as the defining Los Angeles place.
  • The Relax set was reportedly reused for Fright Night’s nightclub sequence.
  • Jake’s car is identified as a 1967 Chevrolet Camaro RS convertible, prompting jokes about jumping into cars.
  • De Palma denies a persistent rumor of many women performing private auditions at his home, saying only Haven and Griffith worked there on the routine; the response is teased but not established as false.
  • Griffith’s routine audition tape was reportedly destroyed at her request.

Recasting Couch

Retain ordinary-man lead; Hanks; Russell; Dreyfuss; Caruso; Turner as Gloria

In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 00:16:16Read transcript
  • Wasson’s odd, unstarry presence is questioned, but a major star such as Travolta or Pacino might not work as this humiliated protagonist.
  • Kurt Russell might give a better performance but make a worse film; Hanks is considered ideal for the ordinary-man part.
  • The casting is defended as a modern Jimmy Stewart ordinary man and struggling low-tier actor; Dreyfuss is considered but his career circumstances complicate it.
  • Wasson works best in the first act but may lack force for the later thriller. Caruso is floated, then doubted as someone a partner would cheat on.
  • Wasson’s mundane early behavior emphasizes his lack of star aura; Giamatti is imagined as a later-era alternative.
  • Kathleen Turner as Gloria could supply both the appearance and voice, though the character’s limited function would probably remain.

Casting What-Ifs

Curtis, Haven, Hamilton, Fisher; Kristel as Gloria

In the discussion (5)
Approx. transcript time · 00:23:23Read transcript
  • Jamie Lee Curtis is a rumored alternative, but Griffith is considered a better fit.
  • Annette Haven was considered and tested, contributed dialogue and advice, but Griffith’s test was stronger; Haven’s intelligence is contrasted with the role’s need for comic energy.
  • Linda Hamilton reportedly declined Holly for The Terminator, prompting speculation about swapping the careers and whether Griffith could have played Sarah Connor.
  • Curtis reportedly declined after Griffith introduced her; Fisher and Tatum O’Neal are less certain possibilities. Fisher’s cynical intelligence might fit Holly and break her Star Wars image.
  • Sylvia Kristel was reportedly wanted for Gloria but unavailable; discussion of her drinking problems raises doubt about the fit.

Roger Ebert's review

In the discussion (1)
Approx. transcript time · 00:33:18Read transcript
  • Ebert’s score is three and a half stars; his praise emphasizes pure filmmaking, Hitchcockian danger and identification with the flawed hero. No denominator is stated.

Picking Nits

Sam’s elaborate plan; Gloria’s whereabouts; drill; makeup; implausible coordination

In the discussion (16)
Approx. transcript time · 00:41:13Read transcript
  • The house’s parking/access and emphasized plant-watering duty raise questions; the plants may exist to keep Jake returning home but receive no clear payoff.
  • The blocking tree, Jake’s departure and the disguised watcher’s conspicuous positioning depend on unexplained coordination.
  • Starting with strangulation makes the drill plan unclear; the proposed safe-break-in explanation is challenged because the auger is for wood rather than metal.
  • Gloria not running away and instead calling 911 with her back to the attacker is questioned.
  • The highly elaborate sequence seems implausibly good for a 1984 adult film; its missing-climax complaint is compared with Boogie Nights.
  • Sam’s enormous grave at a reservoir crest seems an especially implausible plan vulnerable to erosion.
  • Jake misses obvious relationship and work warning signs yet rapidly solves an elaborate murder, creating inconsistent competence.
  • Sam’s plan requires disguises, cars, properties and a witness who fails to recognize him; a simpler staged staircase fall is proposed instead.
  • The urgent house-sitting handoff and plants depend on Sam finding a suitable replacement, although he has overheard Jake seeking housing.
  • Gloria’s whereabouts during Holly’s nightly bedroom performance are unexplained, with beach-house or social-life guesses.
  • Jake carrying Gloria’s underwear for roughly ten hours despite going home is noted, alongside his nearly unchanged outfit.
  • News coverage of Gloria’s murder should expose her husband’s face to Jake or fellow acting students, undermining Sam’s disguise-based scheme.
  • Jake immediately becoming a leading adult performer is questioned, but prolific production and his audition experience are offered as reasons it could happen.
  • Sam apparently applies a disguise alone that reportedly took the real production three and a half hours daily.
  • Hiring a famous adult star for the deception seems riskier than an unknown dancer, though Holly’s physical resemblance to Gloria is the explanation.
  • Sam bringing the dog everywhere causes his demise and seems avoidable.

Producer review

Entertaining visual excess; well-cast Wasson except claustrophobic face

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 00:53:56Read transcript
  • The invited first-time reaction initially mistakes Relax for a dream, then finds the unexpected on-set sequence compelling and entertaining.
  • The final invited response loves the film’s excessive ambition, personal cynicism, beauty and A-list craft applied to a B-movie genre, while doubting that it has a deep message.
  • Wasson is defended as well cast and effective except for the claustrophobic face; possible later roles are discussed without a convincing match.

Probably Unanswerable Questions

Dog’s survival; phone confidant; whole-film dream; hypothetical casting consequences

In the discussion (8)
Approx. transcript time · 01:06:41Read transcript
  • The dog is tentatively linked with White Dog, and its survival is imagined rather than established; Sam’s failure to swim also raises a question.
  • Whether Sam was also the man with Jake’s girlfriend is briefly wondered and considered unlikely.
  • Gloria’s payphone confidant is unidentified; an affair is presumed as a possible motive but remains speculative.
  • Jake’s physical suitability for adult performance is wondered about because his initial characterization seems inconsistent with his comfort there.
  • A hypothetical accidental casting of underage Traci Lords raises questions about removing footage or withdrawing tapes; the discussion distinguishes ordinary acting from explicit scenes and remains speculative.
  • The most humiliating sexual position to discover a partner in becomes a crude hypothetical, with doggy style proposed and a Longlegs joke added.
  • The whole story might be Jake’s claustrophobic fantasy: the spinning kiss, reservoir unreality and restored job suggest either an opening-set episode or acting-class trauma as a starting point.
  • An imagined De Palma interview confirming the dream theory is explicitly not a real statement he made.