‹ All movies
Minority Report poster

Minority Report

146 minutes

Cast

Selected cast credits · Film reference

Tom Cruise Officer John Anderton
Colin Farrell Danny Witwer
Max von Sydow Director Lamar Burgess
Lois Smith Dr. Iris Hineman

Minority Report | The Rewatchables

Explore episodeClose episode

Producer credits not yet identified.

Half-Assed Internet Research

Expert-led 2054 design; production history; noir and Hitchcock influences; Fugitive parallels

In the discussion (8)
Approx. transcript time · 00:13:58Read transcript
  • Spielberg reportedly convened fifteen experts for three days and developed an eighty-page 2054 guide; his predictions of personalized advertising and privacy loss are considered prescient.
  • The first CruiseSpielberg collaboration reportedly began development in 1997 but was delayed by Mission: Impossible 2 and AI; several production companies were involved.
  • Cruise and Spielberg reportedly took fifteen percent of gross to hold the budget below one hundred million dollars.
  • The reported budget is $102 million and worldwide gross $354 million.
  • Diaz, Crowe and Anderson reportedly make uncredited subway appearances; the literary Anderton is described as older, bald and out of shape.
  • The literary ending is tentatively recalled as exile to another planet; the original pre-cogs differ markedly, while Spielberg’s noir viewing and deliberate overlighting shaped the film.
  • The car-factory scene reportedly draws on an unfilmed North by Northwest sequence described to Truffaut.
  • Parallels with The Fugitive include a framed protagonist, subway recognition, trusted-colleague betrayal, appearance changes, risky escape jumps and a ceremonial public exposure.

Roger Ebert's review

In the discussion (2)
Approx. transcript time · 00:36:24Read transcript
  • After guesses and a joking four-and-a-half, the stated Ebert score is four stars; no denominator is spoken in this passage.
  • The quoted review praises technology serving story and character and the film’s technical virtuosity; four-and-a-half stars is subsequent hyperbole.

Picking Nits

Eye-transplant recovery; retinal access; abandoned witness; prediction paradox; Burgess’s slip and ending

In the discussion (7)
Approx. transcript time · 00:41:55Read transcript
  • The fire escape appears nine stories high, but the ensuing drop looks closer to fifty.
  • Rapid recovery from an eyeball transplant is considered implausible even with future technology.
  • Quickly encountering Ann Lively’s drowning is questioned, then explained as Agatha deliberately drawing attention to her mother.
  • Burgess’s revealing slip is revisited and his simple self-shooting finale is criticized as unimaginative after the film’s elaborate action.
  • Anderton’s retained retinal security access after becoming a fugitive is criticized; even his wife can use the old eyes to enter.
  • Police leaving the rescued woman alone by the lake enables Burgess to murder her; taking a statement or remaining with her would disrupt the plot.
  • Anderton learning about Crow through the prediction creates a causal paradox; the objection is defended as central to the premise and Agatha’s effort to solve her mother’s death.

Casting What-Ifs

Damon or Bardem; Streep; McKellen; Blanchett; Elfman

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:15:48Read transcript
  • Development reportedly began as a Schwarzenegger Total Recall sequel, changed after Carolco’s bankruptcy and later involved Jan de Bont.
  • Reported offers included Damon or Bardem for Witwer, Streep for Iris, McKellen for Burgess, Blanchett for Agatha and Elfman for Lara; Streep declined and scheduling affected Damon and McKellen.
  • Bardem reportedly declined because he did not want to chase Cruise through an entire film; his upcoming F1 appearance invites a joke.

Recasting Couch

Retain D.C.; alternate old cities; Pinkett or Blanchett as Agatha; Berry as Lara

In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 01:18:57Read transcript
  • Washington is defended as fitting; Boston, New Orleans and Philadelphia are alternative settings.
  • Miami is judged too cheerful; an old dense city rebuilt for the future is preferred, with London and Chicago suggested.
  • Jada Pinkett is proposed as Agatha; Blanchett is praised and Portman’s age is debated.
  • Halle Berry is proposed as a pre-cog but considered too prominent, then redirected to Lara.

Probably Unanswerable Questions

Affair and murder; disguises; crane-fight odds; pre-cog search joke

In the discussion (5)
Approx. transcript time · 01:37:11Read transcript
  • A provocative question about the wife’s affair and Howard’s reaction is raised, with the lover’s haste mocked rather than resolved.
  • The response explicitly rejects that the wife deserved death, while criticizing the lover for pressing to use the marital bed.
  • Cruise’s repeated disguises are compared across films; injecting a facial paralytic seems pointless when he is promptly recognized.
  • Farrell is favored in a real crane fight because of age, size and apparent experience; proposed odds move from roughly three-to-one toward a shorter price.
  • A teasing question about searching for pre-cog pornography receives a denial.

Producer review

Does not click; overlong; cold visuals and uneven early CGI

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:41:04Read transcript
  • The invited response says the film does not click on a second viewing despite recognizing Spielberg’s intended achievement.
  • The runtime is criticized as about half an hour too long and dragging, with two-and-a-half-hour blockbusters considered less usual then.
  • Cold bleached visuals and uneven early digital effects are disliked; consistently stylized older films are considered less distracting than mixed convincing and weak CGI.