Out of Sight poster
Out of Sight

Picking Nits

Back-and-forth chronology; fantasy set in the real hotel room; the report she couldn't have written; Foley going back for the maid; Ripley bragging about diamonds

In the discussion (9)
Approx. transcript time · 01:14:27Read transcript
  • Never seeing the scenes of Clooney's loyal buddy calling his sister, only hearing about them secondhand, is flagged as a picking-nits item.
  • The back-and-forth chronology was a little confusing on first viewing, though time stamps might have broken the flow.
  • Lopez's bathtub fantasy cheats by being set in the exact hotel, in the same color scheme, where Clooney and Rames are actually staying, though she has never been there.
  • A high-angle hotel shot after the Lompoc flashback signals the return to the present; the Mad Men fever dream is cited as a delicate case.
  • One speaker is anti-dream sequence and anti-narrator unless proven to work.
  • A nitpick read online: when did she write the report her boss is reading if she was unconscious after the crash?
  • Would Jack Foley really go back for the maid? He is fundamentally not a good guy, so the moment may not be earned.
  • Why would Albert Brooks's titan-of-industry character tell these guys about $5 million in diamonds?
  • Returning to the maid point: the movie takes pains to show Foley won't hurt anyone, knocking out the guard with a vase rather than killing him.