Categories & segments

Die Hard with a Vengeance poster
Die Hard with a Vengeance

What Piece of Memorabilia Would You Want From This Movie?

Katia’s knife; prop gold brick; replacement shirt; sandwich board rejected

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:57:11Read transcript
  • Katia’s knife and a movie-used gold brick are desired, with recognition that the prop brick would be fake.
  • McClane’s packaged replacement shirt is another desired item.
  • The racist sandwich board is rejected, including a blank version; imagined reactions are jokes.
In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 01:59:34Read transcript
  • Die Hard followed directly by this film is a pairing, skipping the more self-contained second installment.
  • Under Siege is another pairing; The Siege is separately proposed for New York and Willis, with its merits debated.
  • Pulp Fiction is the final additional pairing.
In the discussion (2)
Approx. transcript time · 02:00:28Read transcript
  • Jackson receives two explicit winner choices for refreshing the franchise and bringing out Willis’s willingness to share the screen.
  • Willis receives a competing choice because John McClane is hard to beat; the Jackson case emphasizes proving Pulp Fiction was no fluke and carrying a major hit.
Podcast choices
Speaker not identified
Samuel L. Jackson
Speaker not identified
Samuel L. Jackson
Speaker not identified
Bruce Willis
In the discussion (5)
Approx. transcript time · 00:23:27Read transcript
  • The famous account says Olivier answered Hoffman’s sleep-deprivation method acting by suggesting that he simply act.
  • The exchange has been retold in conflicting versions by participants and chroniclers.
  • Hoffman’s Studio 54 detail is questioned because the club opened after the movie’s release.
  • Hoffman later said Olivier was joking and described a warm final-day visit.
  • The hosts favor Goldman’s version while acknowledging the dispute and Goldman’s stake in the rewritten ending.
Marathon Man poster
Marathon Man

Roger Ebert's review

In the discussion (3)
Approx. transcript time · 00:31:38Read transcript
  • Ebert gave the film three stars while praising its moment-to-moment thriller craft despite plot holes.
  • The hosts argue the movie merits four stars and that Ebert withheld about half a star too much.
  • Contemporary critics are described as having unusually high expectations for 1976 thrillers.
Marathon Man poster
Marathon Man

Most Rewatchable Scene

The “Is it safe?” torture sequence

In the discussion (9)
Approx. transcript time · 00:34:33Read transcript
  • The opening road-rage crash is nominated and also called exaggerated enough to evoke a later spoof.
  • Doc’s Paris hotel fight and the piano-wire attack are nominated.
  • Doc visiting Babe and then testing Elsa over lunch are nominated for dialogue and character revelation.
  • Doc’s stabbing and bloody arrival at Babe’s apartment are nominated.
  • Babe trapped naked in the bathroom is praised for suspense and helplessness.
  • The dental torture and repeated “Is it safe?” question are praised as iconic and terrifying.
  • Szell being recognized in the Diamond District and opening the deposit box are nominated.
  • Doc’s Paris material is a favorite for its ominous atmosphere.
  • The “Is it safe?” sequence is selected as the most rewatchable scene.
Marathon Man poster
Marathon Man

The most "year the movie came out" thing

Original Nazis still active in 1976

In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 00:44:32Read transcript
  • Living perpetrators from World War II still operating openly is selected as the strongest 1976 marker.
  • Marathon training being treated as strange is nominated.
  • New York City’s 1976 appearance is nominated.
  • The film’s barely stated gay relationship is nominated as period-specific.
  • Diamonds priced at fifteen thousand dollars per carat are nominated.
  • McCarthyism victims functioning as a central plot device is selected as another period marker.
Displaying discussions 2233 - 2244 of 6801 in total