Roger Ebert's review
In the discussion (4)
Approx. transcript time · 00:19:17Read transcript
- The review segment reports three out of four stars.
- It is not considered his kind of movie since he loves strength of character and plot, though he probably appreciated its Hitchcockian formal inventiveness.
- After watching twice, he concluded greater understanding helped on the plot level but did not enrich the viewing experience; confusion is the state we are intended to be in.
- A counterpoint holds that being disoriented and confused the whole time is the best part of the movie and exactly what the filmmaker wants.