Picking Nits
Obvious intoxication; unsafe flight; hotel safeguards; bottle count; hearing delay; supervision timing
In the discussion (5)
Approx. transcript time · 01:31:16Read transcript
- His intoxication should be obvious by smell and behavior, though the copilot noticed and Margaret knew his habits. Trina should be anxious after sharing his sleepless drug-fueled night.
- Autopilot and Whip’s choice to fly aggressively through weather are discussed with uncertainty about automated takeoffs versus landings.
- The adjoining hotel door and stocked minibar should have been secured, and the guard should have heard the destructive night.
- The enormous bottle count seems physically implausible even with tolerance; no verified medical threshold is asserted.
- Postpone the hearing with a food-poisoning excuse or bring him into supervised sobriety closer to testimony rather than leaving a long interval.