Modern technology would ruin the plot: cameras, phone location and texting would expose the criminals quickly. The sparse police response is also questioned.
Nitpicks question the lack of a family dog or sports poster and Carl being uncircumcised.
Carl returning to Gaear and burying the money far away are questioned; avoiding discovery of the full ransom and fear of retaliation are possible explanations.
Wade failing to connect Jerry’s funding request to the ransom is a nitpick. Jerry’s underlying money trouble remains intentionally unexplained, with gambling and sexual misconduct only guesses.
The long criminal road trip and overnight stay are challenged by the short regional distances, with blizzard conditions offered as a counterpoint.
The failed 1997 Fargo television pilot with Edie Falco and director Kathy Bates prompts discussion of how its failure left Falco available for The Sopranos, and which cast members were essential.
Prestige television is the obvious continuation because the series exists. Recollections of its connections are uncertain; Hobbit actor confusion is corrected to Martin Freeman.
Unanswerable questions concern why Marge is pregnant and whether a woodchipper could dispose of a body; pregnancy is interpreted as new life amid death and the DNA evidence is an objection.
The missing license tags are identified as the mistake that unravels the crime. The criminals’ conspicuous conduct and low fee prompt further criticism.
Gaear’s prior life and the Shep/Carl/Gaear relationships are unresolved. Shared prison history is speculative, while Shep’s refusal to vouch for Carl may reflect dislike rather than unfamiliarity.
Crime-film lessons include breaking ties with former prison associates and avoiding provocative nicknames; the discussion is hypothetical.
The central life lesson is that life means more than money; Yanagita supplies the counterexample to always shooting one’s shot, although Marge’s hotel suggestion is debated.