‹ All movies
Two for the Money poster

Two for the Money

122 minutes

Cast

Selected cast credits · Film reference

Two for the Money | The Rewatchables

Explore episodeClose episode

Producer credits not yet identified.

Roger Ebert's review

In the discussion (1)
Approx. transcript time · 00:26:26Read transcript
  • Roger Ebert’s review is explicitly three and a half out of four, praising the visible pleasure of the performances; the reported box office did not match the enthusiasm.

Picking Nits

Betting logic; business costs; pricing; offseason; football details; car; streaks; credit; omitted scam; bruschetta

In the discussion (12)
Approx. transcript time · 00:39:31Read transcript
  • The story appears to cover one football season, with an implausibly perfect early winning streak.
  • The low Super Bowl total and a thin trend spanning many years are nitpicked, though earlier real totals are acknowledged.
  • Walter spends implausibly on surveillance, sex workers and gifts despite apparent financial trouble.
  • The huge price for a single pick makes little sense if cheaper customers receive the same information.
  • The absence of other sports and off-season business is questioned, alongside a joking proliferation of game-of-the-year labels.
  • An uncalled block in the opening and simplistic football reasoning are nitpicked, including treating the coach’s former team as an obscure insight.
  • Not wagering on his own extraordinary picks is the central logic problem; the family setup also seems to lack a later payoff.
  • The fancy New York car, empty roads and perfect picking streak are implausible.
  • Amir’s abrupt wealth, enormous losses and access to credit strain plausibility; the story does not show earlier winnings cushioning later losses.
  • Brandon is interpreted as temporarily lucky rather than truly gifted.
  • The omitted split-list sales scam could have explained the business and given the hero something to resist.
  • A final nit argues the hero’s original bruschetta pronunciation was correct and the correction was wrong.

Casting What-Ifs

Role written for Rene Russo

In the discussion (1)
Approx. transcript time · 01:11:00Read transcript
  • Little casting research is available beyond the writer creating the role for his wife.

Half-Assed Internet Research

Real USFL footage; real advice-service number

In the discussion (1)
Approx. transcript time · 01:17:46Read transcript
  • Research identifies actual USFL footage and a real advice-service phone number used in the film.

Probably Unanswerable Questions

Monday-night chasing; ideal anxious-husband actor; earnings; Walter’s motives

In the discussion (7)
Approx. transcript time · 01:34:31Read transcript
  • The claim that Monday-night popularity comes from chasing losses is questioned; Sunday night is offered as the more natural chase before Monday settlement.
  • Pacino is proposed as the top casting choice for a sexually displaced husband.
  • Other possible actors for the sexually anxious husband include Hackman, Douglas and Gere, without a settled ranking.
  • Indoor Oakley wraparound sunglasses are admired.
  • Brandon’s total earnings remain unclear; percentages and a $100,000 payment on a $2million win are discussed.
  • Employer-funded housing and perks may explain apparent wealth without large cash compensation.
  • The staged kiss and surveillance support a reading of Walter gambling on his marriage by trying to replace himself with Brandon.

Producer review

Improves on rewatch; Pacino makes it entertaining

In the discussion (1)
Approx. transcript time · 01:41:56Read transcript
  • The invited producer chooses Pacino and says the performance turns an initially modest reaction into greater enjoyment on revisiting clips.