‹ All movies
Meet the Parents poster

Meet the Parents

108 minutes

Cast

Selected cast credits ·

Robert De Niro Jack Byrnes
Ben Stiller Greg Focker
Blythe Danner Dina Byrnes
Teri Polo Pam Byrnes
James Rebhorn Larry Banks

Meet the Parents | The Rewatchables

Explore episodeClose episode

Casting What-Ifs

Soderbergh; Spielberg with Carrey and possible Pacino; Myers uncertain; Watts; Walken backup

In the discussion (7)
Approx. transcript time · 00:21:41Read transcript
  • Mike Myers is initially said to have been offered the role; later discussion explicitly qualifies the conflicting reports.
  • Steven Soderbergh reportedly tried to develop the remake before leaving for Out of Sight.
  • Spielberg reportedly considered directing and producing with Jim Carrey and possibly Al Pacino.
  • Carrey remained involved after Spielberg departed and contributed ideas before leaving; reports of a Mike Myers offer are explicitly uncertain.
  • Stiller is judged better for awkward dinner-table humor than the more physical version imagined for Carrey.
  • Naomi Watts reportedly initially had Pam’s role and said producers replaced her because they did not find her sexy enough; that explanation is met with disbelief.
  • Christopher Walken reportedly was the backup if De Niro declined, inviting a Wedding Crashers comparison.

Half-Assed Internet Research

Original indie film; box office and video; Oscar song; home movies; smoking; De Niro role choice; polygraph; DeHuff; cats; Focker name; set behavior; ratings rule; Litter Kwitter; Polo bankruptcy

In the discussion (18)
Approx. transcript time · 00:24:56Read transcript
  • The film originated with a low-budget 1992 version by Greg Glienna; Universal’s rights purchase reportedly allowed it to suppress that earlier film, which intermittently reappears online.
  • Randy Newman’s A Fool in Love received an Original Song Oscar nomination.
  • A $55 million budget and roughly $330 million gross are reported; it beat Remember the Titans on opening weekend.
  • The film is reported as the seventh-biggest release of 2000; the sequels earned $522.7 million and $310.7 million respectively.
  • Video sales reportedly added $200 million in 2001, illustrating the lucrative home-video era.
  • Polo’s husband’s home movies were reportedly inserted after test audiences disliked Pam, making her more appealing as a romantic partner.
  • Stiller reportedly was not a smoker and felt uncomfortable smoking beside De Niro, whose screen technique he admired.
  • Claims that the bomb dialogue was removed from airplane screenings conflict with a recent personal flight viewing that retained it.
  • De Niro reportedly turned down Any Given Sunday to make this film.
  • De Niro reportedly suggested the polygraph scene.
  • Nicole DeHuff, who played Pam’s sister, died at 30 after pneumonia; the diagnosis and sequel timing are discussed with uncertainty.
  • Two Himalayan cats, Bailey and Misha, played Jinx, with Misha doing most scenes.
  • Jim Carrey reportedly devised the Focker surname.
  • De Niro reportedly enjoyed the cat between takes and encouraged more scenes with it.
  • De Niro reportedly kept his distance from Stiller to sustain their characters’ unease; Stiller later acknowledged he was not especially nice.
  • The ratings body reportedly required proof of a real Focker surname before permitting it.
  • The movie reportedly inspired the successful Litter Kwitter cat toilet-training product.
  • Polo’s 2014 bankruptcy filing is mentioned without an explanation.

Roger Ebert's review

In the discussion (1)
Approx. transcript time · 00:28:52Read transcript
  • Ebert awarded three stars and found it funnier than Austin Powers because it did not try too hard.

Picking Nits

Puff cassette; toilet; roof cigarette; rushed engagement; secret proposal; usher; borrowed clothes; painted cat; volleyball injury and positions

In the discussion (12)
Approx. transcript time · 00:32:33Read transcript
  • Playing Puff the Magic Dragon on cassette during an ordinary drive is strange even for 2000.
  • Giving a guest a basement room whose toilet cannot be flushed is inhospitable and leaves an obvious practical problem.
  • Lighting a cigarette while retrieving a cat from an in-law’s roof seems an extreme and unnecessary expression of nicotine dependence.
  • A wedding only two weeks after the engagement is implausibly fast.
  • Greg intends to propose after ten months without meeting Pam’s highly involved parents.
  • Children would not reliably keep the planned proposal secret.
  • Making Greg an usher immediately after meeting and belittling him is odd.
  • Greg should buy basic clothes instead of borrowing family underwear; his spending elsewhere shows he can afford it.
  • The toilet should be repaired or labeled; interpreting it as Jack’s deliberate boyfriend test is speculative.
  • Painting the substitute cat’s tail is indefensible.
  • The volleyball victim does not raise her hands, and the quantity of blood seems excessive for the injury later shown.
  • The much taller Rebhorn should defend the net rather than Stiller.

Recasting Couch

Gwyneth Paltrow; Polo as sister; Brad Pitt; Seth Rogen or Seth Green; Fincher horror version

In the discussion (5)
Approx. transcript time · 01:11:43Read transcript
  • A Fincher horror version is imagined; Spielberg might introduce parental adultery, but the actual director is considered the right fit.
  • Gwyneth Paltrow as Pam, with her real mother already playing Dina, is favored; Polo could become the sister.
  • Brad Pitt as Kevin could exaggerate the ex-boyfriend’s intimidating perfection, while Owen Wilson’s performance remains admired.
  • Young Seth Rogen is proposed for Pam’s younger brother.
  • Seth Green is the other younger-brother choice.

Probably Unanswerable Questions

SimpliSafe; Jack smoking; Gaylord name; male nursing; further polygraph questions; Christmas setting

In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 01:43:00Read transcript
  • Did Jack’s monitoring gadgets inspire SimpliSafe? This is playful speculation.
  • Would a Vietnam veteran and CIA operative such as Jack really never have smoked?
  • Why would parents name a child Gaylord Focker? A family-name explanation is speculated about but not confirmed.
  • Did the movie harm the reputation or appeal of male nursing?
  • What else did Jack ask during the truncated polygraph session? Politics, partners and drugs are imagined.
  • Why not make this a Christmas movie? Replacing the rushed wedding with an engagement holiday would enable recurring seasonal viewing.

Producer review

Tight, largely timeless comedy

In the discussion (2)
Approx. transcript time · 01:48:02Read transcript
  • The script is praised as exceptionally tight, with almost continuous jokes and little wasted material.
  • The movie is considered largely timeless despite the male-nurse jokes and a mild Jewish barb; technology would not fundamentally change its conflicts.