Probably Unanswerable Questions
Open questions cover Marion’s bar, exploding-head fame, alternate casting, E.T.’s origin, Indy’s satchel, archaeological ethics, changing outfits, emotional reactions, and Indy’s motivation.
In the discussion (6)
Approx. transcript time · 01:43:06Read transcript
- The economics and regular clientele of Marion’s isolated Nepal bar are unknowable.
- The panel asks why Belloq’s exploding head did not become the dominant reference instead of Scanners.
- They ask how much worse the movie and its box office would be with Tom Selleck, and whether E.T. exists without Melissa Mathison and Spielberg discussing it on this set.
- Indy’s bag prompts a satchel-versus-man-purse debate, and his treasure-taking is questioned as looting rather than archaeology.
- Marion’s frequent wardrobe changes and Sallah’s subdued response to her presumed death are treated as unexplained behavior.
- The largest question is what actually motivates Indy beyond holding and donating history, since neither money nor romance explains his risks.