Picking Nits
Friends fail to intervene; injuries and police response; the cat sandwich; wish logic; Sarah’s timing and car.
The panel keeps both criticisms and explanations about character selfishness, budget, and plot mechanics.
In the discussion (17)
Approx. transcript time · 01:24:02Read transcript
- Sarah telling Bear about Ian and Nikki is criticized as a calculated romantic move.
- Bear failing to insist on treatment for Nikki’s bottle wounds is criticized.
- The characters’ selfishness is offered as the general explanation for several nitpicks.
- Bear still attending boys’ night after the alarming wish call is criticized.
- Nobody calling police or intervening at the party is criticized.
- The cat opening and consuming oxycodone is questioned.
- The dead cat prop is criticized as visibly cheap, while avoiding an animated effect is defended.
- Bear’s negligence is blamed for the cat’s death.
- The cat belonging to Bear’s late grandmother is offered as a speculative reason for his lack of attachment.
- The sandwich’s room-temperature handling, smell, and resemblance to turkey are questioned.
- The house already smelling terrible is offered as an explanation for why Bear does not detect the sandwich.
- Bear initially trying to alter rather than cancel the wish is criticized.
- Nikki’s face is judged insufficiently injured after repeated bottle blows.
- Sarah’s body prop is criticized as mannequin-like.
- Disposal of Sarah’s car and the limited police presence are questioned.
- Nikki’s ability to retrieve a gun, copy tattoos, and cut hair in time is questioned.
- Sarah’s middle-of-the-night meeting request is criticized as avoidable timing.